• County-Based Immigrant Coverage Proposal Gaining Steam in King County

    In April, NoHLA released a new report with recommendations for a new approach to provide comprehensive health coverage to uninsured immigrants. County-based health coverage programs, modeled off of programs operating in other states, including California and Maryland, could close the coverage gaps that persist for adult immigrants. The proposal is picking up steam in King […]

    Continue reading
  • Census Changes: Cause for Concern

    Advocates are extremely concerned about the potential inaccuracy of the 2020 census, which will have a huge impact on continued federal funding. The Trump Administration ‘s proposal to include a citizenship question would undoubtedly suppress participation in the census from immigrants who are intimidated by the question. Washington State Budget & Policy Center Executive Director […]

    Continue reading
  • Proposed Gag Rule Undermines Women’s Health

    We previously mentioned the Administration’s proposal to significantly alter the Title X family planning program. The policy change is often considered a “gag rule” because it precludes providers from giving patients referrals for abortion services if they receive family planning funds. The proposed rule would seriously undermine the Title X program by interfering with the […]

    Continue reading
  • The War on Medicaid Still Isn’t Over

    There have been a lot of assaults on Medicaid lately, at both the federal and state levels. We’re happy that Washington State has been supportive of Medicaid and its enrollees (see below). But recent threats at the federal level could impact our state in the future, adding up to more war on Medicaid. The recent […]

    Continue reading
  • Supreme Court Nomination: What it May Mean for Health Care

    When Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy recently announced his retirement, people began to fret about what a new conservative Supreme would mean for health care, including access to birth control and legal abortions. The nomination of Brett Kavanaugh has particularly alarmed Affordable Care Act (ACA) supporters, reproductive health advocates, and many others because of his […]

    Continue reading
  • More Junk Plans Coming Your Way

    Final association health plan (AHP) rules spell trouble for consumers. AHPs have been around for a long time, but the new federal rules allow more groups to become AHPs and forego coverage of the essential health benefits while offering premiums varying not based on health, but on factors like geographic location, age, marital status and/or […]

    Continue reading
  • Who Does Support Ending Pre-Existing Condition Protections?

    The June Kaiser Health Tracking Poll found that 76% of voters, including 58% of Republicans, say coverage for pre-existing conditions is “very important” to them. But last month, the Administration decided not to defend the ACA from a legal challenge with the potential to undo pre-existing condition protections. Senator Maria Cantwell recently called on the […]

    Continue reading
  • The Impact of Immigration Policy on Health and Health Care

    Immigration remains a hot topic. Congress failed to pass a “compromise” immigration bill a few weeks ago, leaving DACA recipients “in legal limbo.” The Administration is scrambling to reunite children separated from their parents at the border to meet a judge’s order – they have until July 26 and are already behind schedule with the […]

    Continue reading
  • Washington State Launches HealthCareCompare Website

    Many states have established a system to collect information from insurance companies on health care price and quality. Washington State is one of only six states that currently make this information more accessible to consumers online, with the recent launch of the new HealthCareCompare website. The website aggregates claims data from commercial, Medicaid and Medicare […]

    Continue reading
  • More Uncertainty Created for Insurers

    The Trump Administration unexpectedly suspended risk adjustment payments to Exchange plans after conflicting court decisions about the payment methodology. Experts say that the Administration doesn’t need to suspend the payments (only re-evaluate the methodology) and is reacting in an unnecessarily slow and disruptive way. Originally one of three risk mitigation strategies set out in the […]

    Continue reading